Questionable promotion and minimal disciplinary actions
I am writing to seek clarification and understanding regarding the procedures and criteria employed for internal promotions within our esteemed organization, with a particular focus on directorial positions.
As a dedicated member of our team, I value the principles of transparency and fairness that underpin our organizational culture. However, recent observations have prompted me to inquire about the process through which internal promotions, especially at the directorial level, are conducted.
Specifically, concerns have arisen regarding instances where individuals who have been the subject of multiple complaints and have only received minimal disciplinary actions have been quietly promoted. This occurrence has led to questions about the alignment between our promotion practices and our commitment to fostering an environment of accountability and excellence.
I firmly believe that all employees, regardless of their hierarchical position, should be held to the highest standards of conduct and performance. In light of this, I propose that there be mechanisms in place for employees to provide feedback on upper management, similar to the evaluations that employees undergo themselves. This would not only ensure accountability but also promote a culture of continuous improvement and mutual respect within our organization.
Furthermore, it is imperative that those occupying leadership roles demonstrate not only proficiency in their responsibilities but also exemplify qualities of effective leadership. It is disconcerting when individuals prioritize personal advancement over the fulfillment of their leadership obligations, as this can have adverse effects on team morale and organizational success.